Skip to main content

Renewable energy new installed capacity ...the good and the bad news

The good and the bad news

Two weeks ago, IRENA organization (International Renewable ENergy Agency) published it's 2020 report. Several positive highlights can be found :

The world has today a total renewable energy electricity production of 2.500 Giga Watts (GW) - installed capacity-. This is a + 7,4 % increase over the last year, and a fantastic +100 % increase over the last decade!  Interesting to note that about 50% of this increase is located in Asia, and close to 75% consist of solar and wind sources. 

More interesting to note is the following: the new electricity production plants are more and more fueled by renewable energies rather than fossil sources (almost 3/4 in 2019):
(sources : IRENA press release)

This is consistent years after years. The recent COVID-19 crisis will probably accelerate this as, due to current low oil prices, new investments in fossil fuel installations are slowed down drastically.

Is it good news? YES sure. 
Is it enough to limit elevation temperature to 2°C (and therefore control climate change)? No for sure.       

Indeed first, it is important to mention that the "load factor" for most renewable energies (ratio between real electricity production and nominal installed capacity) is half compared to fossil fuel installation and just a quarter of one of a nuclear power plant (see Jancovici's article for full details).
So in reality, % electricity produced by renewable energies (in Watt-hour) is lower than the % measured on installed capacity. 

Second, we are speaking about extra electricity production capacity here, it means that the electricity demand is still increasing (actually it rose from 12.000 TWh in 1990 to 26.000 TWh in 2018).

 As electricity production is the first greenhouse gas emitter  (it accounts for 25% of total CO2 emission;  see section "facts" to have more insights), it means that humanity is still loading more and more tons of CO2 eq. gases in the atmosphere years after years to produce its electricity.

So what can we do?

We encourage you to refer to the section "solutions" of this blog to have an extensive view of EXISTING solutions today. It requires an holistic approach, taking into account regional specificities, acting on the reduction of sources of greenhouse gases (and energy demand), improving greenhouse sinks and more generally the society.   

 As we did with the previous post about Bill Gates and Terra power solution, we propose to share our discoveries, explore the existing energy and food production alternatives and see the potential impact they can have for a better world. 


Popular posts from this blog

Hydrogen fuel cartridge .. let's power bikes ?

As "green" hydrogen production and storage has become an EU green deal central strategic axis, more and more innovative solutions emerge from academic and industrial players. Early this month, the Fraunhofer institute published an article presenting a prototype of what we can call "hydrogen power paste": hydrogen power paste (source : Fraunhofer institute) The principle behind is to create a magnesium hydride paste (whereas a high quantity of hydrogen is stored). When water is added to the mix, hydrogen gas is produced and can be used in a fuel cell to create electricity.  In the previously published article describing hydrogen fuel principles and applications, we mentioned that this H2 energy source was particularly suited for heavy transportation such as trains, trucks, or boats. This power paste concept is particularly interesting for light mobility or applications where there are no refill stations neither H2 storage tanks easily available. One can think of Hyd

Carbon Sources & Sinks

By not distinguishing between a fact and an opinion, by dint of confusing orders of magnitude and time scales, I wanted to find the large masses of carbon production and carbon sinks and share them here. We have included in the site under the "fact" tab the data we found in "the Project Drawdown - March 2020" and which states, by order of magnitude:   Carbon sources 1.       Electricity production                : 25% 2.       Cultivation & agriculture         : 24% 3.       Industry                                     : 21% 4.       Transportation                         : 14% 5.       Building                                    :    6% 6.       Rest                                           : 10%   Carbon sinks 1.       Land                                           : 24% 2.       The oceans                                : 17% 3.       The Atmosphere                        : 59%   What about taking another source: the book of Bill Gates, "How to avoid a

It must be Atomic !

  After long weeks of absence, I take up the pen again.  The vacations of this summer 2020 were an opportunity to discuss and meet brilliant people with whom I had the chance to exchange on what tomorrow could be like.  I have to write "could" because here, there are no exact sciences anymore, but relatively strong hypotheses. Remember the book  "The limit to growth" in 1972. The book was based on The World3 model, a system dynamics model for computer simulation of interactions between population, industrial growth, food production, and limits in the earth's ecosystems. These hypotheses tell us that the energy mix road will be 35% renewable energy and 65% nuclear energy. However, in Europe (Belgium, France, Germany), we turn away from nuclear power due to a lack of political courage or even the capacity to simply decide.  And yet we have developed all the technology.  What has become of it? The only EPR reactors (European Pressurized Water Reactor) operating are